[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHRrFS3a8=x4shoNXHLtmvkFgV8xASsQL0-hiUBb-O1Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:54:24 +0000
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/21] slab: remove struct kmem_cache_cpu
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 2:29 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On 1/20/26 13:40, Hao Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 03:40:35PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >> @@ -3853,7 +3632,7 @@ static bool has_pcs_used(int cpu, struct kmem_cache *s)
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> - * Flush cpu slab.
> >> + * Flush percpu sheaves
> >> *
> >> * Called from CPU work handler with migration disabled.
> >> */
> >> @@ -3868,8 +3647,6 @@ static void flush_cpu_slab(struct work_struct *w)
> >
> > Nit: Would it make sense to rename flush_cpu_slab to flush_cpu_sheaf for better
> > clarity?
>
> OK
>
> > Other than that, looks good to me. Thanks.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>
I noticed one hit on deactivate_slab in the comments after applying
the entire patchset. Other than that LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists