[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260121231520.GA1221379@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:15:20 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ACPI: PCI: simplify code with
acpi_get_local_u64_address()
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:50:49AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Now we have a helper so there's no need to open-code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Looks like most drivers/acpi commits capitalize the subject line,
e.g., s/simplify/Simplify/
> ---
>
> v2: fixed a typo (LKP)
>
> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> index 741bcc9d6d6a..15234b65ea22 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ static int
> check_slot(acpi_handle handle, unsigned long long *sun)
> {
> int device = -1;
> - unsigned long long adr, sta;
> + unsigned long long sta;
> acpi_status status;
> + u64 adr;
> struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>
> acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> @@ -56,10 +57,9 @@ check_slot(acpi_handle handle, unsigned long long *sun)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_ADR", NULL, &adr);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - pr_debug("_ADR returned %d on %s\n",
> - status, (char *)buffer.pointer);
> + if (acpi_get_local_u64_address(handle, &adr)) {
> + pr_debug("_ADR returned with failure on %s\n",
> + (char *)buffer.pointer);
> goto out;
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists