[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLm7kOxTa47POtNGYcjHm-S3neKWKAgjZL_5uw--syMCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:28:14 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@...a.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/13] bpf: Migrate bpf_task_work_schedule_*
kfuncs to KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 2:27 PM Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> return 0;
> - bpf_task_work_schedule_signal_impl(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, process_work, NULL);
> +
> + bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, process_work);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -102,6 +105,8 @@ int oncpu_lru_map(struct pt_regs *args)
> work = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&lrumap, &key);
> if (!work || work->data[0])
> return 0;
> - bpf_task_work_schedule_resume_impl(task, &work->tw, &lrumap, process_work, NULL);
> +
> + bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &lrumap, process_work);
> +
> return 0;
I removed extra empty lines, since they don't fit the style
of these tests.
While applying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists