lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kmku2oyevj5vbt6na73iyksyod4sjcvik5zx43h4mw55m744oo@ddiynkvadmni>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 12:41:39 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, 
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, 
	Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] zsmalloc: make common caches global

On (26/01/19 13:44), Nhat Pham wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 9:53 PM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > On (26/01/16 13:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > Currently, zsmalloc creates kmem_cache of handles and zspages
> > > for each pool, which may be suboptimal from the memory usage
> > > point of view (extra internal fragmentation per pool).  Systems
> > > that create multiple zsmalloc pools may benefit from shared
> > > common zsmalloc caches.
> >
> > This is step 1.
> >
> > Step 2 is to look into possibility of sharing zsmalloc pools.
> > E.g. if there are N zram devices in the system, do we really need
> > N zsmalloc pools?  Can we just share a single pool between them?
> 
> Ditto for zswap (although here, we almost always only have a single zswap pool).

COMPLETELY UNTESTED (current linux-next doesn't boot for me, hitting
an "Oops: stack guard page: 0000" early during boot).

So I'm thinking of something like below.  Basically have a Kconfig
option to turn zsmalloc into a singleton pool mode, transparently
for zsmalloc users.

---
 mm/Kconfig    | 11 ++++++++
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index 4fc1a171dffa..ff6855e74c3d 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -132,6 +132,17 @@ menu "Zsmalloc allocator options"
 
 comment "Zsmalloc is a common backend allocator for zswap & zram"
 
+config ZSMALLOC_SINGLETON_POOL
+	bool "Use a singleton zsmalloc pool"
+	default n
+	help
+	  This option enables the use of a single global zsmalloc pool
+	  instance for all users of zsmalloc (e.g., zswap, zram). This
+	  reduces memory overhead and fragmentation by sharing size class
+	  configurations and memory between different users.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config ZSMALLOC_STAT
 	bool "Export zsmalloc statistics"
 	select DEBUG_FS
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index 8df45aa1b5c8..acd14b001342 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -224,6 +224,10 @@ struct zs_pool {
 	atomic_t compaction_in_progress;
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_SINGLETON_POOL
+static struct zs_pool *zs_singleton_pool;
+#endif
+
 static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
 {
 	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
@@ -2051,17 +2055,7 @@ static int calculate_zspage_chain_size(int class_size)
 	return chain_size;
 }
 
-/**
- * zs_create_pool - Creates an allocation pool to work from.
- * @name: pool name to be created
- *
- * This function must be called before anything when using
- * the zsmalloc allocator.
- *
- * On success, a pointer to the newly created pool is returned,
- * otherwise NULL.
- */
-struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name)
+static struct zs_pool *__zs_create_pool(const char *name)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct zs_pool *pool;
@@ -2170,9 +2164,29 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name)
 	zs_destroy_pool(pool);
 	return NULL;
 }
+
+/**
+ * zs_create_pool - Creates an allocation pool to work from.
+ * @name: pool name to be created
+ *
+ * This function must be called before anything when using
+ * the zsmalloc allocator.
+ *
+ * On success, a pointer to the newly created pool is returned,
+ * otherwise NULL.
+ */
+struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_SINGLETON_POOL
+	return zs_singleton_pool;
+#else
+	return __zs_create_pool(name);
+#endif
+
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_create_pool);
 
-void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
+static void __zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
 {
 	int i;
 
@@ -2203,8 +2217,35 @@ void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool)
 	kfree(pool->name);
 	kfree(pool);
 }
+
+void zs_destroy_pool(struct zs_pool *pool __maybe_unused)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_SINGLETON_POOL
+	__zs_destroy_pool(pool);
+#endif
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zs_destroy_pool);
 
+static void zs_destroy_singleton_pool(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_SINGLETON_POOL
+	if (zs_singleton_pool) {
+		__zs_destroy_pool(zs_singleton_pool);
+		zs_singleton_pool = NULL;
+	}
+#endif
+}
+
+static int zs_create_singleton_pool(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_SINGLETON_POOL
+	zs_singleton_pool = __zs_create_pool("zsmalloc");
+	if (!zs_singleton_pool)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+#endif
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void zs_destroy_caches(void)
 {
 	kmem_cache_destroy(handle_cachep);
@@ -2235,9 +2276,16 @@ static int __init zs_init(void)
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 
+	rc = zs_create_singleton_pool();
+	if (rc) {
+		zs_destroy_caches();
+		return rc;
+	}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
 	rc = set_movable_ops(&zsmalloc_mops, PGTY_zsmalloc);
 	if (rc) {
+		zs_destroy_singleton_pool();
 		zs_destroy_caches();
 		return rc;
 	}
@@ -2252,6 +2300,7 @@ static void __exit zs_exit(void)
 	set_movable_ops(NULL, PGTY_zsmalloc);
 #endif
 	zs_stat_exit();
+	zs_destroy_singleton_pool();
 	zs_destroy_caches();
 }
 
-- 
2.52.0.457.g6b5491de43-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ