lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXAhf+ueMAOkiZrf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:44:47 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	<corbet@....net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
	<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<luto@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	<hch@...radead.org>, <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 19/22] KVM: nVMX: Handle FRED VMCS fields in nested
 VMX context

On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:30:01PM -0800, Xin Li wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 1, 2025, at 10:32 PM, Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> +
>>> + nested_vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vmx, msr_bitmap_l1, msr_bitmap_l0,
>>> +  MSR_IA32_FRED_RSP0, MSR_TYPE_RW);
>> 
>> Why is only this specific MSR handled? What about other FRED MSRs?
>
>Peter just gave a good explanation:
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f0768546-a767-4d74-956e-b40128272a09@zytor.com/

Do you need to set up vmcs02's MSR bitmap for other FRED MSRs?

Other FRED MSRs are passed through to L1 guests in patch 8. Is there any
concern about passing through them to L2 guests?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ