linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: altera: document Stratix 10 eMMC compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6e2d08cd-758a-4e18-b00c-57f9a917ad84@altera.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 08:39:47 +0000
From: "Ng, Tze Yee" <tze.yee.ng@...era.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, "Ng, Tze Yee" <tze.yee.ng@...era.com>
CC: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: altera: document Stratix 10 eMMC
 compatible

On 21/1/2026 3:46 am, Conor Dooley wrote:
> [You don't often get email from conor@...nel.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> [CAUTION: This email is from outside your organization. Unless you trust the sender, do not click on links or open attachments as it may be a fraudulent email attempting to steal your information and/or compromise your computer.]
Hi Conor,

Just to confirm I understand correctly, would you like me to update both:

1. The binding schema (altera.yaml) to split the Stratix 10 boards into 
two patterns, with the eMMC variant having a fallback chain?

       - description: Stratix 10 boards
         items:
           - enum:
               - altr,socfpga-stratix10-socdk
               - altr,socfpga-stratix10-swvp
           - const: altr,socfpga-stratix10

       - description: Stratix 10 SoCDK eMMC variant
         items:
           - const: altr,socfpga-stratix10-socdk-emmc
           - const: altr,socfpga-stratix10-socdk
           - const: altr,socfpga-stratix10

2. The device tree (socfpga_stratix10_socdk_emmc.dts) to update the 
compatible property

from:
compatible = "altr,socfpga-stratix10-socdk-emmc", "altr,socfpga-stratix10";

to:
compatible = "altr,socfpga-stratix10-socdk-emmc",
"altr,socfpga-stratix10-socdk",
"altr,socfpga-stratix10";

Please let me know if this is the expected approach, or if you had 
something different in mind.