[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wm1bti6m.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:43:13 +0100
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin
KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP
Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao
Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>, Cong Wang
<cong.wang@...edance.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf, sockmap: Fix incorrect copied_seq
calculation
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 07:38 AM -08, John Fastabend wrote:
> We could probably push this without the 2/3 patch? If we are debating
> that patch still would be good to get this merged.
Definitely. But also see my email from today [1]. I think I figured a
way how we can make leave FIONREAD in a better shape that it is today -
with what Jiayuan proposed - and improve it in the future.
[1] https://msgid.link/871pjjux2u.fsf@cloudflare.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists