linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27e88ef0-afc9-4108-a136-754a90ade0bd@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:57:01 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>
Cc: "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
 "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
 "dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com" <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>,
 "alexander.stein@...tq-group.com" <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
 "Markus.Niebel@...group.com" <Markus.Niebel@...group.com>,
 "matthias.schiffer@...group.com" <matthias.schiffer@...group.com>,
 "y.moog@...tec.de" <y.moog@...tec.de>,
 "josua@...id-run.com" <josua@...id-run.com>,
 Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
 "primoz.fiser@...ik.com" <primoz.fiser@...ik.com>,
 "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
 "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

On 21/01/2026 09:05, Sherry Sun wrote:
> 
> 
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
>>
>> On 21/01/2026 04:18, Sherry Sun wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 06:26:03PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
>>>>> Add DT compatible string for NXP i.MX93W EVK board.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>>> index 93ad6f0027d0..1769f243d70f 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>>> @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-evk       # i.MX93 11x11 EVK Board
>>>>>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-frdm      # i.MX93 11x11 FRDM Board
>>>>>                - fsl,imx93-14x14-evk       # i.MX93 14x14 EVK Board
>>>>> +              - fsl,imx93w-evk            # i.MX93W EVK Board
>>>>
>>>> Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>
>>> IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the  i.MX93
>>> 11x11 EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I
>>> prefer to still use this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the board
>> official name.
>> It's second case, previous was frdm, with the same argument. I don't care
>> what you prefer internally. You must align to upstream and all NXP boards are
>> called soc-foo. Not socfoo.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> The soc name is imx93w, the board is basically reuse the i.MX93 11x11 EVK,
> so do you suggest we name it fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk or fsl,imx93w-evk?

If SoC is imx93w then your compatible is wrong. It clearly says imx93
(no "w").

Best regards,
Krzysztof