[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <398b4dab-ee76-44f4-9bfd-4388af954808@web.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:03:18 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Haoxiang Li <lihaoxiang@...c.iscas.ac.cn>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: st: clkgen-pll: Add iounmap() in
clkgen_c32_pll_setup()
> Add a iounmap() to release the memory allocated by
an call?
> clkgen_get_register_base() in error path.
Was such an improvable implementation detail detected by any known source code
analysis approaches?
…
> +++ b/drivers/clk/st/clkgen-pll.c
…
> @@ -829,6 +829,9 @@ static void __init clkgen_c32_pll_setup(struct device_node *np,
> kfree(pll_name);
> kfree(clk_data->clks);
> kfree(clk_data);
> +err_unmap:
> + if (pll_base)
> + iounmap(pll_base);
* I find this pointer check redundant because of a previous variable check.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19-rc5/source/drivers/clk/st/clkgen-pll.c#L771-L773
* I suggest to refine the goto chain a bit more.
> }
>
> static void __init clkgen_c32_pll0_setup(struct device_node *np)
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists