[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<VI0PR04MB12114C9E6A4170AD957E92A609296A@VI0PR04MB12114.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:17:32 +0000
From: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org"
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Daniel Baluta
<daniel.baluta@....com>, "dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com"
<dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>, "alexander.stein@...tq-group.com"
<alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>, "Markus.Niebel@...group.com"
<Markus.Niebel@...group.com>, "matthias.schiffer@...group.com"
<matthias.schiffer@...group.com>, "y.moog@...tec.de" <y.moog@...tec.de>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>, "primoz.fiser@...ik.com"
<primoz.fiser@...ik.com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kernel@...gutronix.de"
<kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 21/01/2026 11:51, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > <snip>
> >
> >>>>>> + - fsl,imx93w-evk # i.MX93W EVK Board
> >>>>> Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Hi Frank,
> >>>>
> >>>> IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the
> >>>> i.MX93
> >>>> 11x11 EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I
> >>>> prefer to still use this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the
> >>>> board
> >>> official name.
> >>> It's second case, previous was frdm, with the same argument. I don't
> >>> care what you prefer internally. You must align to upstream and all
> >>> NXP boards are called soc-foo. Not socfoo.
> >> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>
> >> The soc name is imx93w, the board is basically reuse the i.MX93 11x11
> >> EVK, so do you suggest we name it fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk or fsl,imx93w-
> evk?
> > As per my understanding from Krzysztof comment this should be fsl,imx93-
> w-evk.
> > Like soc-foo not socfoo.
> If the soc is "imx93w", the physical size / variant is "11x11" and the board is
> "evk", then I'd define compatible as "fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk", "fsl,imx93w",
> "fsl,imx93".
Hi Josua,
Thanks for the suggestion, "fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk", "fsl,imx93w", "fsl,imx93"
compatible seems more reasonable.
Best Regards
Sherry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists