lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026-01-21-losing-next-board-lamp-aBQSVB@cyphar.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 13:20:22 +0100
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
Cc: kees@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>, 
	Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, 
	Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...raber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] seccomp: keep track of seccomp filters with
 closed listeners

On 2025-12-11, Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com> wrote:
> Let's distinguish seccomp filters with closed listener
> vs seccomp filters which never had listener.
> 
> We can easily do this by using the same ->notif pointer
> field with help of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
> 
> No functional change intended.

The discussion we had at LPC made me think this would result in a
(justifiable) functional change to fix this bug, but you're quite right
that this only matters once you enable nested listeners.

In either case, feel free to take my

Reviewed-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>

Thanks!

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
https://www.cyphar.com/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (266 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ