lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a76a4a7-c02c-436a-8f69-57606a6b2bed@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 13:43:41 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
 Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Chia-Lin Kao <acelan.kao@...onical.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
 "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/ASPM: Override the ASPM and Clock PM states
 set by BIOS for devicetree platforms


On 22/01/2026 13:17, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

...

>> Since this commit was added in Linux v6.18, I have been observing a suspend
>> test failures on some of our boards. The suspend test suspends the devices
>> for 20 secs and before this change the board would resume in about ~27 secs
>> (including the 20 sec sleep). After this change the board would take over 80
>> secs to resume and this triggered a failure.
>>
>> Looking at the logs, I can see it is the NVMe device on the board that is
>> having an issue, and I see the reset failing ...
>>
>>   [  945.754939] r8169 0007:01:00.0 enP7p1s0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full -
>>    flow control rx/tx
>>   [ 1002.467432] nvme nvme0: I/O tag 12 (400c) opcode 0x9 (Admin Cmd) QID
>>    0 timeout, reset controller
>>   [ 1002.493713] nvme nvme0: 12/0/0 default/read/poll queues
>>   [ 1003.050448] nvme nvme0: ctrl state 1 is not RESETTING
>>   [ 1003.050481] OOM killer enabled.
>>   [ 1003.054035] nvme nvme0: Disabling device after reset failure: -19
>>
>>  From the above timestamps the delay is coming from the NVMe. I see this
>> issue on several boards with different NVMe devices and I can workaround
>> this by disabling ASPM L0/L1 for these devices ...
>>
>>   DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(0x15b7, 0x5011, quirk_disable_aspm_l0s_l1);
>>   DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(0x15b7, 0x5036, quirk_disable_aspm_l0s_l1);
>>   DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(0x1b4b, 0x1322, quirk_disable_aspm_l0s_l1);
>>   DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(0xc0a9, 0x540a, quirk_disable_aspm_l0s_l1);
>>
>> I am curious if you have seen any similar issues?
>>
> 
> Marek reported a similar issue on ARM Juno board [1] on which one of the switch
> downstream port failed to come up while *entering* system suspend. But I was
> clueless as to why the device fails to function only while entering system
> suspend and not during runtime. I suspect something is going wrong in the
> suspend path.
> 
> In your case, looks like the device is failing while resuming from suspend. Did
> you see any error log during suspend as well?

I don't see any errors on entering suspend, just resuming from suspend. 
One other thing that I notice, on resuming in a good case I see ...

  tegra194-pcie 141e0000.pcie: Link didn't transition to L2 state

In a bad case I see ...

  tegra194-pcie 141e0000.pcie: Link didn't transition to L2 state
  tegra194-pcie 14160000.pcie: Link didn't transition to L2 state
  tegra194-pcie 14160000.pcie: Link didn't go to detect state

It appears that this is related because ...

  tegra194-pcie 14160000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0004:00
  ...
  nvme nvme0: pci function 0004:01:00.0

>> Other PCIe devices seem to be OK (like the realtek r8169) but just the NVMe
>> is having issues. So I am trying to figure out the best way to resolve this?
>>
> 
> First let's try to isolate the issue to L0s or L1. Can you try disabling L0s
> first, then L1?

Yes I will try this today.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ