lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN4SLj1z07jqJOuZQ3x-ND=-aViMUhZgaBf3n4k0-R_SryzNFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 23:54:09 +0800
From: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@...il.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: vexpress-config: Fix device node reference leak in probe

Hi Liviu,
Thanks for the review.
I will remove the header file and send out V2.

Best regars,
Felix
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 9:32 PM Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 08:33:04PM +0800, Felix Gu wrote:
> > In vexpress_syscfg_probe(), of_parse_phandle() is called inside a loop
> > but the returned device_node reference is never released.
> > Fix this by using the __free(device_node) cleanup handler to automatically
> > release the reference when the variable goes out of scope.
> >
> > Fixes: a5a38765ac79b ("bus: vexpress-config: simplify config bus probing")
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c b/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c
> > index 64ee920721ee..a1fa583e9f5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/vexpress-config.c
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Limited
> >   */
> >
> > +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>
> Not sure this is needed. of.h includes cleanup.h, so we don't run the risk of
> not getting the cleanup macros defined.
>
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > @@ -390,9 +391,8 @@ static int vexpress_syscfg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       }
> >
> >       for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, "arm,vexpress,config-bus") {
> > -             struct device_node *bridge_np;
> > -
> > -             bridge_np = of_parse_phandle(node, "arm,vexpress,config-bridge", 0);
> > +             struct device_node *bridge_np __free(device_node) =
> > +                     of_parse_phandle(node, "arm,vexpress,config-bridge", 0);
> >               if (bridge_np != pdev->dev.parent->of_node)
> >                       continue;
> >
>
> Otherwise, patch looks good to me. Thanks for the fix!
>
> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
>
> Best regards,
> Liviu
>
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 053966c344dbd346e71305f530e91ea77916189f
> > change-id: 20260122-b4-vexpress-config-1d2051861d93
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Felix Gu <ustc.gu@...il.com>
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ