[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVs_ODx3eByHkU03vopUuLuY7=uRnfTKuai65jNr+xMhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:31:42 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...lbox.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux/interrupt.h: allow "guard" notation to disable
and reenable IRQ with valid IRQ check
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 at 17:22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2026-01-22 00:23:47 [+0100], Marek Vasut wrote:
> > @@ -242,6 +242,21 @@ extern void irq_wake_thread(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id);
> > DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(disable_irq, int,
> > disable_irq(*_T->lock), enable_irq(*_T->lock))
> >
> > +static inline void disable_valid_irq(unsigned int irq)
> > +{
> > + if (irq > 0)
> > + disable_irq(irq);
> > +}
>
> | $ grep " 0:" /proc/interrupts
> | 0: 43 0 IO-APIC 2-edge timer
>
> in other words, interrupt 0 is valid.
AFAIK, the x86 legacy timer interrupt is the sole remaining valid user
of interrupt number zero.
Nowadays lots of code assumes valid interrupt numbers are non-zero
positive numbers.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists