[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260122-headlamp-champion-0bbad2551d33@spud>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:52:31 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: riscv: Add Supm extension description
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:10:31AM +0800, Guodong Xu wrote:
> Add description for the Supm extension. Supm indicates support for pointer
> masking in user mode. Supm is mandatory for RVA23S64.
>
> The Supm extension is ratified in commit d70011dde6c2 ("Update to ratified
> state") of riscv-j-extension.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
> index 4ffd61926505..1922dff03787 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
> @@ -262,6 +262,23 @@ properties:
> ratified in RISC-V Profiles Version 1.0, with commit b1d806605f87
> ("Updated to ratified state.")
>
> + - const: supm
> + description: |
> + The standard Supm extension for pointer masking support in user
> + mode (U-mode) as ratified at commit d70011dde6c2 ("Update to
> + ratified state") of riscv-j-extension.
> +
> + Supm represents a combination of underlying hardware capability
> + (Smnpm or Ssnpm), U-mode consumer privilege level, and M/S-mode
Should we therefore make this require that Smnpm or Ssnpm are present?
> + software configuration that enables pointer masking for U-mode.
> +
> + DO NOT include this property in device trees targeting privileged
> + system software (S-mode or M-mode).
> +
> + This property is only appropriate in device trees provided to
> + U-mode software where the next-higher-privilege-mode supports
> + Smnpm or Ssnpm and enables it for U-mode.
> +
> - const: svade
> description: |
> The standard Svade supervisor-level extension for SW-managed PTE A/D
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists