[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260122200757.47863f0f@jic23-huawei>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 20:07:57 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, David Lechner
<dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy
Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix check for invalid
samples from FIFO
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:23:34 +0100
Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com> wrote:
> The DRDY_MASK feature implemented in sensor chips marks gyroscope and
> accelerometer invalid samples (i.e. samples that have been acquired during
> the settling time of sensor filters) with the special values 0x7FFFh,
> 0x7FFE, and 0x7FFD.
> The driver checks FIFO samples against these special values in order to
> discard invalid samples; however, it does the check regardless of the type
> of samples being processed, whereas this feature is specific to gyroscope
> and accelerometer data. This could cause valid samples to be discarded.
>
> Fix the above check so that it takes into account the type of samples being
> processed. In st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(), change the type of the data
> parameter to __le16 *, to reflect the fact that this function is called
> with an aligned data argument and avoid casting to __le16 * when checking
> sample values.
Hi Francesco,
I'm going to guess Andy meant all the way up rather than pushing the cast
upwards. I think this can be done in a fashion that cleans up the type
representation in general.
>
> Fixes: 960506ed2c69 ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: enable drdy-mask if available")
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> index 5b28a3ffcc3d..ded9a96076e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> @@ -539,14 +539,14 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> #define ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE 0x7ffd
> static int
> st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw, u8 tag,
> - u8 *data, s64 ts)
> + __le16 *data, s64 ts)
> {
> - s16 val = le16_to_cpu(*(__le16 *)data);
> struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor;
> struct iio_dev *iio_dev;
>
> /* invalid sample during bootstrap phase */
> - if (val >= ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE)
> + if ((tag == ST_LSM6DSX_GYRO_TAG || tag == ST_LSM6DSX_ACC_TAG) &&
> + (s16)le16_to_cpup(data) >= ST_LSM6DSX_INVALID_SAMPLE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> @@ -670,7 +670,8 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_read_tagged_fifo(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
> reset_ts = true;
> ts *= hw->ts_gain;
> } else {
> - st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(hw, tag, iio_buff,
> + st_lsm6dsx_push_tagged_data(hw, tag,
> + (__le16 *)iio_buff,
This is ugly but at least it's near the declaration so improvement on previous.
However, I smell a cleaner solution. If I read the buffer definition correctly
it could be replaced with
struct {
__le16 data[3];
aligned_s64 timestamp;
} iio_buff = { };
//note the zeroing because the code never writes the hole which is
bad... Also that the { } is guaranteed to fill the hole with the build options
the kernel uses (there is a selftest for this).
Which will let you pass iio_buf->data to this call.
> ts);
> }
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists