lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEvNRgEd=Uh09dU_P7_vvzRpOyMYd=OKazpkxzr=VLe5HcQhGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 12:30:53 -0800
From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>
To: kalyazin@...zon.com, "Kalyazin, Nikita" <kalyazin@...zon.co.uk>, 
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, 
	"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel@...0n.name" <kernel@...0n.name>, 
	"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, 
	"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>, "oupton@...nel.org" <oupton@...nel.org>, 
	"joey.gouly@....com" <joey.gouly@....com>, "suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>, 
	"yuzenghui@...wei.com" <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
	"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, 
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, 
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, 
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>, 
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>, 
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "david@...nel.org" <david@...nel.org>, 
	"lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, 
	"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, "vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>, 
	"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>, "surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>, "mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>, 
	"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>, "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>, "martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, 
	"eddyz87@...il.com" <eddyz87@...il.com>, "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>, 
	"yonghong.song@...ux.dev" <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, 
	"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>, "kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>, 
	"sdf@...ichev.me" <sdf@...ichev.me>, "haoluo@...gle.com" <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
	"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>, "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, 
	"jhubbard@...dia.com" <jhubbard@...dia.com>, "peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>, 
	"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>, "pfalcato@...e.de" <pfalcato@...e.de>, 
	"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>, "riel@...riel.com" <riel@...riel.com>, 
	"ryan.roberts@....com" <ryan.roberts@....com>, "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>, 
	"yu-cheng.yu@...el.com" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>, 
	"coxu@...hat.com" <coxu@...hat.com>, "kevin.brodsky@....com" <kevin.brodsky@....com>, 
	"maobibo@...ngson.cn" <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, "prsampat@....com" <prsampat@....com>, 
	"mlevitsk@...hat.com" <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, "jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>, 
	"jthoughton@...gle.com" <jthoughton@...gle.com>, "agordeev@...ux.ibm.com" <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	"alex@...ti.fr" <alex@...ti.fr>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
	"borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, "chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, 
	"dev.jain@....com" <dev.jain@....com>, "gor@...ux.ibm.com" <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	"hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	"Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	"pjw@...nel.org" <pjw@...nel.org>, 
	"shijie@...amperecomputing.com" <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>, "svens@...ux.ibm.com" <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	"thuth@...hat.com" <thuth@...hat.com>, "wyihan@...gle.com" <wyihan@...gle.com>, 
	"yang@...amperecomputing.com" <yang@...amperecomputing.com>, 
	"vannapurve@...gle.com" <vannapurve@...gle.com>, "jackmanb@...gle.com" <jackmanb@...gle.com>, 
	"aneesh.kumar@...nel.org" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>, "patrick.roy@...ux.dev" <patrick.roy@...ux.dev>, 
	"Thomson, Jack" <jackabt@...zon.co.uk>, "Itazuri, Takahiro" <itazur@...zon.co.uk>, 
	"Manwaring, Derek" <derekmn@...zon.com>, "Cali, Marco" <xmarcalx@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/13] KVM: guest_memfd: Add flag to remove from direct map

Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@...zon.com> writes:

>
> [...snip...]
>
>>>>> @@ -533,6 +580,8 @@ static void kvm_gmem_free_folio(struct folio *folio)
>>>>>         kvm_pfn_t pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>>>>         int order = folio_order(folio);
>>>>>
>>>>> +     kvm_gmem_folio_restore_direct_map(folio);
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> I can't decide if the kvm_gmem_folio_no_direct_map(folio) should be in
>>>> the caller or within kvm_gmem_folio_restore_direct_map(), since this
>>>> time it's a folio-specific property being checked.
>>>
>>> I'm tempted to keep it similar to the kvm_gmem_folio_zap_direct_map()
>>> case.  How does the fact it's a folio-speicific property change your
>>> reasoning?
>>>
>>
>> This is good too:
>>
>>    if (kvm_gmem_folio_no_direct_map(folio))
>>            kvm_gmem_folio_restore_direct_map(folio)
>
> It turns out we can't do that because folio->mapping is gone by the time
> filemap_free_folio() is called so we can't inspect the flags.  Are you
> ok with only having this check when zapping (but not when restoring)?
> Do you think we should add a comment saying it's conditional here?
>

I thought kvm_gmem_folio_no_direct_map() only reads folio->private,
which I think should still be there at the point of
filemap_free_folio().

>>
>> [...snip...]
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ