linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: brcmstb: allow parent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdrWp+RosNFP+S+1iSYrM9KmZ6hgn=bLV27+26C0GKH+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:45:56 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>, 
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>, Christophe Leroy <chleroy@...nel.org>, 
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: brcmstb: allow parent_irq to wake

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 9:44 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 3:06 AM Florian Fainelli
> <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com> wrote:

...

> > -static void brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(struct device *dev, bool save)
> > +static void brcmstb_gpio_quiesce(struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv, bool save)
> >  {
> > -       struct brcmstb_gpio_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >         struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
> >         u32 imask;
> >
> > -       /* disable non-wake interrupt */
> > -       if (priv->parent_irq >= 0)
> > -               disable_irq(priv->parent_irq);
> > -
> >         list_for_each_entry(bank, &priv->bank_list, node) {
> >                 if (save)
> >                         brcmstb_gpio_bank_save(priv, bank);

> One more thing, how is "save" being used? I can't see it other than a dead code.

Ah, it was a preexisted parameter, I was under the impression that it
was just added without use. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko