linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] f2fs: optimize f2fs_overwrite_io() for f2fs_iomap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8a00c027-d14d-44c8-9105-b385fabb37f2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:15:00 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@...sung.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
 jyh429@...il.com, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: chao@...nel.org, Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
 Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] f2fs: optimize f2fs_overwrite_io() for
 f2fs_iomap_begin

On 1/16/2026 6:23 PM, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
> When overwriting already allocated blocks, f2fs_iomap_begin() calls
> f2fs_overwrite_io() to check block mappings. However,
> f2fs_overwrite_io() iterates through all mapped blocks in the range,
> which can be inefficient for fragmented files with large I/O requests.
> 
> This patch optimizes f2fs_overwrite_io() by adding a 'check_first'
> parameter and introducing __f2fs_overwrite_io() helper. When called from
> f2fs_iomap_begin(), we only check the first mapping to determine if the
> range is already allocated, which is sufficient for setting
> map.m_may_create.
> 
> This optimization significantly reduces the number of f2fs_map_blocks()
> calls in f2fs_overwrite_io() when called from f2fs_iomap_begin(),
> especially for fragmented files with large I/O requests.
> 
> Fixes: 351bc761338d ("f2fs: optimize f2fs DIO overwrites")
> Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sunmin Jeong <s_min.jeong@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yeongjin Gil <youngjin.gil@...sung.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/data.c | 10 ++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 2e133a723b99..bfbd717e628a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1851,7 +1851,8 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map, int flag)
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> -bool f2fs_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len)
> +static bool __f2fs_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len,
> +				bool check_first)

Yeongjin,

You may missed to add logic related to check_first parameter?

Thanks,

>   {
>   	struct f2fs_map_blocks map;
>   	block_t last_lblk;
> @@ -1877,6 +1878,11 @@ bool f2fs_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +bool f2fs_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len)
> +{
> +	return __f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, pos, len, false);
> +}
> +
>   static int f2fs_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode,
>   				struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo)
>   {
> @@ -4443,7 +4449,7 @@ static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
>   	 * f2fs_map_lock and f2fs_balance_fs are not necessary.
>   	 */
>   	if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) &&
> -		!f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, offset, length))
> +		!__f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, offset, length, true))
>   		map.m_may_create = true;
>   
>   	err = f2fs_map_blocks(inode, &map, F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO);