[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me7cZffQjtVtCX-cNtR_eKv6eJydaJMFEBpy3_CzzBZCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:33:55 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Udit Tiwari <quic_utiwari@...cinc.com>, Daniel Perez-Zoghbi <dperezzo@...cinc.com>,
Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@....qualcomm.com>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/11] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: implement support for
BAM locking
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 4:37 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > > But they might eventually right?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, and they will already have the interface to do it - in the form
> > of descriptor metadata.
> >
>
> Hi! Have I answered all your questions? Can we proceed with this?
>
> Bartosz
Ping.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists