[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176907695845.510.9038697427680039433.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:15:58 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] entry: Hook up rseq time slice extension
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 3c78aaec19b0621bf952756670c8b066a55202fe
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/3c78aaec19b0621bf952756670c8b066a55202fe
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 17:52:31 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:11:19 +01:00
entry: Hook up rseq time slice extension
Wire the grant decision function up in exit_to_user_mode_loop()
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251215155709.258157362@linutronix.de
---
kernel/entry/common.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
index 5c792b3..9ef63e4 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -17,6 +17,27 @@ void __weak arch_do_signal_or_restart(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
#define EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK_LOOP (EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK)
#endif
+/* TIF bits, which prevent a time slice extension. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+/*
+ * Since rseq slice ext has a direct correlation to the worst case
+ * scheduling latency (schedule is delayed after all), only have it affect
+ * LAZY reschedules on PREEMPT_RT for now.
+ *
+ * However, since this delay is only applicable to userspace, a value
+ * for rseq_slice_extension_nsec that is strictly less than the worst case
+ * kernel space preempt_disable() region, should mean the scheduling latency
+ * is not affected, even for !LAZY.
+ *
+ * However, since this value depends on the hardware at hand, it cannot be
+ * pre-determined in any sensible way. Hence punt on this problem for now.
+ */
+# define TIF_SLICE_EXT_SCHED (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
+#else
+# define TIF_SLICE_EXT_SCHED (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
+#endif
+#define TIF_SLICE_EXT_DENY (EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK & ~TIF_SLICE_EXT_SCHED)
+
static __always_inline unsigned long __exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long ti_work)
{
@@ -28,8 +49,10 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *re
local_irq_enable_exit_to_user(ti_work);
- if (ti_work & (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
- schedule();
+ if (ti_work & (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)) {
+ if (!rseq_grant_slice_extension(ti_work & TIF_SLICE_EXT_DENY))
+ schedule();
+ }
if (ti_work & _TIF_UPROBE)
uprobe_notify_resume(regs);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists