lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <230c749f-ebd6-4829-93ee-601d88000a45@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 11:58:04 +0100
From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
 "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Cc: "npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>, "luto@...nel.org"
 <luto@...nel.org>, "maddy@...ux.ibm.com" <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "tglx@...nel.org" <tglx@...nel.org>, "mpe@...erman.id.au"
 <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "vincenzo.frascino@....com"
 <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
 "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64()



Le 22/01/2026 à 11:49, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit :
>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote:
>>>> Hi Thomas, Christophe,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>>>> For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a
>>>>> 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of
>>>>> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit
>>>>> time types from the kernel and UAPI.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
>>>>
>>>> I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side:
>>>>
>>>>     LDS     arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o
>>>>     VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported
>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1
>>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report!
>>>
>>>> Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test?
>>>
>>> Not immediately, but I'll look into it.
>>>
>>>> I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1.
>>>
>>> Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C937051154ddf479721f708de59a3e01c%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046757528646789%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qkl4zNfg2j%2F24vZV7nQ7LLDtxG0WbgaJc30kjHQZqpk%3D&reserved=0 ?
>>> Could you also share your configuration?
>>
>> I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig +
>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> 
> Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too.
>>
>>    VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not
>> supported
>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79:
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2
>> make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
>>
>> I'll investigate
> 
> It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the
> vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO
> fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does
> not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization
> logic.
> 

Ah, ok.

Reminds me commit b91c8c42ffdd ("lib/vdso: Force inlining of 
__cvdso_clock_gettime_common()")

Problem fixed with:

diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
index 95df0153f05ab..4399e143d43a5 100644
--- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
+++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static __maybe_unused __kernel_old_time_t 
__cvdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *time
  #endif /* VDSO_HAS_TIME */

  #ifdef VDSO_HAS_CLOCK_GETRES
-static __maybe_unused
+static __always_inline
  bool __cvdso_clock_getres_common(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, 
clockid_t clock,
  				 struct __kernel_timespec *res)
  {


Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ