[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHQKDMvrj-NUWVTN=AP0W5rUMdxXFzzp=OphxM7bE2PNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 12:24:50 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, corbet@....net, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org,
feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com, kees@...nel.org, elver@...gle.com, arnd@...db.de,
lirongqing@...du.com, fvdl@...gle.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, bhe@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, rppt@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
osandov@...com, jbohac@...e.cz, sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com, cfsworks@...il.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kexec: Add support for crashkernel CMA reservation
On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 at 10:30, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Jinjie,
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 03:48:20PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> > Extend crashkernel CMA reservation support to arm64.
>
> This is awesome. I was waiting for this patch! Thanks for working on it.
>
That is great!
But the commit log contains no motivation whatsoever why this is such
a good thing, so perhaps one of you can enlighten us? This endless
fiddling with boot-time memory reservations doesn't make the system
more robust, so having a good reason in the commit log why this change
is needed is really needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists