[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260123120302.TsiVMAQb@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:03:02 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hao Li <hao.li@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/22] mm/slab: fix false lockdep warning in
__kfree_rcu_sheaf()
On 2026-01-23 07:52:40 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -6268,11 +6268,26 @@ static void rcu_free_sheaf(struct rcu_head *head)
…
> +static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(kfree_rcu_sheaf_map, LD_WAIT_CONFIG);
> +
> bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj)
> {
> struct slub_percpu_sheaves *pcs;
> struct slab_sheaf *rcu_sheaf;
Would it work to have here something like
BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT));
or WARN_ON+return? The way the code is now it relies on the check in
kvfree_call_rcu() and tells lockdep to be quiet. And since it gets
optimized away…
> + lock_map_acquire_try(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
> +
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists