[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260123134919.20836-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:49:19 +0800
From: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: make the IS_ENABLED macro check warning clearer
When I used checkpatch.pl to check my patch, I received the following
warning:
WARNING: Prefer IS_ENABLED(<FOO>) to CONFIG_<FOO> || CONFIG_<FOO>_MODULE
It identified issues with my patch, but the suggested way to fix them
still left me a bit confused. I think the following suggestion would be
clearer:
WARNING: Prefer IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_<FOO>) to CONFIG_<FOO> || CONFIG_<FOO>_MODULE
Signed-off-by: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@...il.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index c0250244cf7a..e9c45f5d1925 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -7334,7 +7334,7 @@ sub process {
if ($line =~ /^\+\s*#\s*if\s+defined(?:\s*\(?\s*|\s+)(${CONFIG_}[A-Z_]+)\s*\)?\s*\|\|\s*defined(?:\s*\(?\s*|\s+)\1_MODULE\s*\)?\s*$/) {
my $config = $1;
if (WARN("PREFER_IS_ENABLED",
- "Prefer IS_ENABLED(<FOO>) to ${CONFIG_}<FOO> || ${CONFIG_}<FOO>_MODULE\n" . $herecurr) &&
+ "Prefer IS_ENABLED(${CONFIG_}<FOO>) to ${CONFIG_}<FOO> || ${CONFIG_}<FOO>_MODULE\n" . $herecurr) &&
$fix) {
$fixed[$fixlinenr] = "\+#if IS_ENABLED($config)";
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists