[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACZaFFN-dES3HuifdQTjfNr6P=EZQfYkt+O7V_rZ6+yC9Kf98Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:25:20 +0800
From: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...nel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com, baohua@...nel.org, lance.yang@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-new v5 2/5] mm: khugepaged: refine scan progress number
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 6:46 PM Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com> wrote:
>
> On 23/01/26 1:52 pm, Vernon Yang wrote:
> > From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@...inos.cn>
> >
> > Currently, each scan always increases "progress" by HPAGE_PMD_NR,
> > even if only scanning a single PTE/PMD entry.
> >
> > - When only scanning a sigle PTE entry, let me provide a detailed
> > example:
> >
> > static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd()
> > {
> > for (addr = start_addr, _pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > _pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > pte_t pteval = ptep_get(_pte);
> > ...
> > if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) { <-- first scan hit
> > result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP;
> > goto out_unmap;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > During the first scan, if pte_uffd_wp(pteval) is true, the loop exits
> > directly. In practice, only one PTE is scanned before termination.
> > Here, "progress += 1" reflects the actual number of PTEs scanned, but
> > previously "progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR" always.
> >
> > - When the memory has been collapsed to PMD, let me provide a detailed
> > example:
> >
> > The following data is traced by bpftrace on a desktop system. After
> > the system has been left idle for 10 minutes upon booting, a lot of
> > SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE are observed during a full scan
> > by khugepaged.
> >
> > @scan_pmd_status[1]: 1 ## SCAN_SUCCEED
> > @scan_pmd_status[6]: 2 ## SCAN_EXCEED_SHARED_PTE
> > @scan_pmd_status[3]: 142 ## SCAN_PMD_MAPPED
> > @scan_pmd_status[2]: 178 ## SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE
> > total progress size: 674 MB
> > Total time : 419 seconds ## include khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs
> >
> > The khugepaged_scan list save all task that support collapse into hugepage,
> > as long as the task is not destroyed, khugepaged will not remove it from
> > the khugepaged_scan list. This exist a phenomenon where task has already
> > collapsed all memory regions into hugepage, but khugepaged continues to
> > scan it, which wastes CPU time and invalid, and due to
> > khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs (default 10s) causes a long wait for
> > scanning a large number of invalid task, so scanning really valid task
> > is later.
> >
> > After applying this patch, when the memory is either SCAN_PMD_MAPPED or
> > SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE, just skip it, as follow:
> >
> > @scan_pmd_status[6]: 2
> > @scan_pmd_status[3]: 147
> > @scan_pmd_status[2]: 173
> > total progress size: 45 MB
> > Total time : 20 seconds
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@...inos.cn>
> > ---
> > include/linux/xarray.h | 9 ++++++++
> > mm/khugepaged.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
> > index be850174e802..f77d97d7b957 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/xarray.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
> > @@ -1646,6 +1646,15 @@ static inline void xas_set(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned long index)
> > xas->xa_node = XAS_RESTART;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * xas_get_index() - Get XArray operation state for a different index.
> > + * @xas: XArray operation state.
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned long xas_get_index(struct xa_state *xas)
> > +{
> > + return xas->xa_index;
> > +}
> > +
>
> Why is this needed?
Please refer to hpage_collapse_scan_file(), which obtains the starting
address of the last folio when exiting xas_for_each().
Using "xas->xa_index" directly is also acceptable.
> > /**
> > * xas_advance() - Skip over sibling entries.
> > * @xas: XArray operation state.
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 6f0f05148765..de95029e3763 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,10 @@ enum scan_result {
> > static struct task_struct *khugepaged_thread __read_mostly;
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(khugepaged_mutex);
> >
> > -/* default scan 8*HPAGE_PMD_NR ptes (or vmas) every 10 second */
> > +/*
> > + * default scan 8*HPAGE_PMD_NR ptes, pmd_mapped, no_pte_table or vmas
> > + * every 10 second.
> > + */
> > static unsigned int khugepaged_pages_to_scan __read_mostly;
> > static unsigned int khugepaged_pages_collapsed;
> > static unsigned int khugepaged_full_scans;
> > @@ -1240,7 +1243,8 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long a
> > }
> >
> > static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > - struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr, bool *mmap_locked,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr,
> > + bool *mmap_locked, unsigned int *cur_progress,
> > struct collapse_control *cc)
> > {
> > pmd_t *pmd;
> > @@ -1255,6 +1259,9 @@ static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON(start_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
> >
> > + if (cur_progress)
> > + *cur_progress += 1;
> > +
>
> 1. Why do we need to do if (cur_progress). Isn't it guaranteed that the pointer will never be NULL.
cur_progress is NULL at madvise_collapse()
> 2. Why do we increment this on function entry?
When the memory has been collapsed to PMD, we increment one only, same as
the previous PATCH #3 [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260111121909.8410-4-yanglincheng@kylinos.cn
>
> > result = find_pmd_or_thp_or_none(mm, start_addr, &pmd);
> > if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> > goto out;
> > @@ -1396,6 +1403,12 @@ static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
> > }
> > out_unmap:
> > + if (cur_progress) {
> > + if (_pte >= pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR)
> > + *cur_progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1;
> > + else
> > + *cur_progress += _pte - pte;
> > + }
>
> Why are two cases required here - shouldn't it just be _pte - pte?
At the function entry, "cur_progress += 1", If this PMD is SCAN_PMD_MAPPED
or SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE, return directly. otherwise,
When "_pte == pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR" to exit loop, HPAGE_PMD_NR
(also "_pte - pte") PTEs have been scanned, the "cur_progress" needs to be
incremented by "HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1".
When "_pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR" to break loop, "_pte - pte + 1" PTEs have
been scanned, and "cur_progress" needs to be incremented by "_pte - pte".
> > pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> > if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> > result = collapse_huge_page(mm, start_addr, referenced,
> > @@ -2286,8 +2299,9 @@ static enum scan_result collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > -static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > - struct file *file, pgoff_t start, struct collapse_control *cc)
> > +static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + unsigned long addr, struct file *file, pgoff_t start,
> > + unsigned int *cur_progress, struct collapse_control *cc)
> > {
> > struct folio *folio = NULL;
> > struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> > @@ -2376,6 +2390,18 @@ static enum scan_result hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
> > cond_resched_rcu();
> > }
> > }
> > + if (cur_progress) {
> > + unsigned long idx = xas_get_index(&xas) - start;
> > +
> > + if (folio == NULL)
> > + *cur_progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > + else if (xa_is_value(folio))
> > + *cur_progress += idx + (1 << xas_get_order(&xas));
> > + else if (folio_order(folio) == HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
> > + *cur_progress += idx + 1;
> > + else
> > + *cur_progress += idx + folio_nr_pages(folio);
> > + }
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> > @@ -2456,6 +2482,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> >
> > while (khugepaged_scan.address < hend) {
> > bool mmap_locked = true;
> > + unsigned int cur_progress = 0;
> >
> > cond_resched();
> > if (unlikely(hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm)))
> > @@ -2472,7 +2499,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> > mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > mmap_locked = false;
> > *result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm,
> > - khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff, cc);
> > + khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff,
> > + &cur_progress, cc);
> > fput(file);
> > if (*result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
> > mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > @@ -2486,7 +2514,8 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> > }
> > } else {
> > *result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma,
> > - khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked, cc);
> > + khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked,
> > + &cur_progress, cc);
> > }
> >
> > if (*result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
> > @@ -2494,7 +2523,7 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, enum scan_result
> >
> > /* move to next address */
> > khugepaged_scan.address += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> > - progress += HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > + progress += cur_progress;
> > if (!mmap_locked)
> > /*
> > * We released mmap_lock so break loop. Note
> > @@ -2817,7 +2846,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> > mmap_locked = false;
> > *lock_dropped = true;
> > result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm, addr, file, pgoff,
> > - cc);
> > + NULL, cc);
> >
> > if (result == SCAN_PAGE_DIRTY_OR_WRITEBACK && !triggered_wb &&
> > mapping_can_writeback(file->f_mapping)) {
> > @@ -2832,7 +2861,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> > fput(file);
> > } else {
> > result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
> > - &mmap_locked, cc);
> > + &mmap_locked, NULL, cc);
> > }
> > if (!mmap_locked)
> > *lock_dropped = true;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists