linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] u64_stats: Introduce u64_stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260123162159.2877941-2-mmyangfl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 00:21:33 +0800
From: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
	Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
	Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
	Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
	dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] u64_stats: Introduce u64_stats_reads()

The following pattern was observed in the code tree:

        do {
                start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&pstats->syncp);
                memcpy(&temp, &pstats->stats, sizeof(temp));
        } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&pstats->syncp, start));

On 64bit arches, struct u64_stats_sync is empty and provides no help
against load/store tearing. memcpy() or struct copying does not
guarantee tear free, although compilers never generate such instructions
in practice.

Theoretically the affected code should convert to u64_stats_t, or use
atomic operations properly.

However since there are needs to copy chunks of statistics, instead of
writing loops everywhere, we provide a safe memcpy() variant for that
purpose.

Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
index 457879938fc1..15ea4db2a77b 100644
--- a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
+++ b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
@@ -79,6 +79,14 @@ static inline u64 u64_stats_read(const u64_stats_t *p)
 	return local64_read(&p->v);
 }
 
+static inline void *u64_stats_reads(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len)
+{
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(len % sizeof(u64_stats_t));
+	for (size_t i = 0; i < len; i += sizeof(u64_stats_t))
+		*(u64 *)(dst + i) = u64_stats_read((const u64_stats_t *)(src + i));
+	return dst;
+}
+
 static inline void u64_stats_set(u64_stats_t *p, u64 val)
 {
 	local64_set(&p->v, val);
@@ -110,6 +118,7 @@ static inline bool __u64_stats_fetch_retry(const struct u64_stats_sync *syncp,
 }
 
 #else /* 64 bit */
+#include <linux/string.h>
 
 typedef struct {
 	u64		v;
@@ -120,6 +129,12 @@ static inline u64 u64_stats_read(const u64_stats_t *p)
 	return p->v;
 }
 
+static inline void *u64_stats_reads(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len)
+{
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(len % sizeof(u64_stats_t));
+	return memcpy(dst, src, len);
+}
+
 static inline void u64_stats_set(u64_stats_t *p, u64 val)
 {
 	p->v = val;
-- 
2.51.0