[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260123162159.2877941-3-mmyangfl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 00:21:34 +0800
From: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] u64_stats: Doc incorrect usage with plain variables
On 64-bit architectures, u64_stats does rely on the load/store atomicity
of 64-bit data.
However, users often mistakenly believe that the helpers could also
protect/"lock" plain (64-bit) variables, which can lead to load/store
tearing.
Remove the misleading "non atomic operation" comments and add explicit
examples of incorrect usage.
Users may also be tempted to use memcpy() or struct copying. Doc the
usage of u64_stats_reads() for this case.
Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>
---
include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
index 15ea4db2a77b..10f988170e51 100644
--- a/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
+++ b/include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h
@@ -39,21 +39,44 @@
* spin_lock_bh(...) or other synchronization to get exclusive access
* ...
* u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
- * u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes64, len); // non atomic operation
- * u64_stats_inc(&stats->packets64); // non atomic operation
+ * u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes64, len);
+ * u64_stats_inc(&stats->packets64);
* u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
*
* While a consumer (reader) should use following template to get consistent
* snapshot for each variable (but no guarantee on several ones)
*
- * u64 tbytes, tpackets;
- * unsigned int start;
+ * u64 tbytes, tpackets;
+ * unsigned int start;
*
- * do {
- * start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp);
- * tbytes = u64_stats_read(&stats->bytes64); // non atomic operation
- * tpackets = u64_stats_read(&stats->packets64); // non atomic operation
- * } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start));
+ * do {
+ * start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp);
+ * tbytes = u64_stats_read(&stats->bytes64);
+ * tpackets = u64_stats_read(&stats->packets64);
+ * } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start));
+ *
+ * Remember point #2: update_begin()/update_end() and
+ * fetch_begin()/fetch_retry() are no-ops on 64-bit architectures. u64_stats
+ * _cannot_ be used to protect plain variables against tearing.
+ *
+ * u64 stats64, cnt;
+ * struct { u64_stats_t stats[10]; } st, buf;
+ *
+ * u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+ * stats64 = cnt; // no
+ * stats64 += cnt; // no
+ * stats64++; // no
+ * st = buf; // no
+ * memcpy(&st, &buf, sizeof(st)); // no
+ * u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
+ *
+ * do {
+ * start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&stats->syncp);
+ * cnt = stats64; // no
+ * buf = st; // no
+ * memcpy(&buf, &st, sizeof(st)); // no
+ * u64_stats_reads(&buf, &st, sizeof(st)); // use this instead
+ * } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&stats->syncp, start));
*
*
* Example of use in drivers/net/loopback.c, using per_cpu containers,
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists