[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXPhQ-KQOBobMBMh@bywater>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:59:47 +0100
From: Francesco Valla <francesco@...la.it>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@...hat.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] drm: client: add splash client
Hi Maxime,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 02:36:56PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 03:25:40PM +0100, Francesco Valla wrote:
> > Add a DRM client that draws a simple splash, with possibility to show:
> >
> > - a colored background;
> > - a static BMP image (loaded as firmware);
> > - the logo provided by EFI BGRT.
> >
> > The client is not meant to replace a full-featured bootsplash, but
> > rather to remove some complexity (and hopefully boot time) on small
> > embedded platforms or on systems with a limited scope (e.g: recovery
> > or manufacturing images).
> >
> > The background color can be set either at build time from a dedicated
> > config option or at runtime through the drm_client_lib.splash_color
> > command line parameter. Any color in RGB888 format can be used.
> >
> > If enabled, the static BMP image is loaded using the kernel firmware
> > infrastructure; a valid BMP image with 24bpp color and no compression
> > is expected. The name of the image can be set through the
> > drm_client_lib.splash_bmp kernel command line parameter, with the
> > default being 'drm_splash.bmp'.
> >
> > Just like the existing DRM clients, the splash can be enabled from the
> > kernel command line using drm_client_lib.active=splash.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Francesco Valla <francesco@...la.it>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/clients/Kconfig | 79 ++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/clients/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/clients/drm_client_internal.h | 9 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/clients/drm_client_setup.c | 8 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/clients/drm_splash.c | 883 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 979 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/clients/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/clients/Kconfig
> > index 6096c623d9d5b1a3d4a40d986c45aad2f8277767..dd8cd6cacd1166932eb3890dd816b9ae2d26330f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/clients/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/clients/Kconfig
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config DRM_CLIENT_LIB
> > config DRM_CLIENT_SELECTION
> > tristate
> > depends on DRM
> > + select DRM_CLIENT_LIB if DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH
> > select DRM_CLIENT_LIB if DRM_CLIENT_LOG
> > select DRM_CLIENT_LIB if DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
> > help
> > @@ -85,10 +86,79 @@ config DRM_CLIENT_LOG
> > If you only need logs, but no terminal, or if you prefer userspace
> > terminal, say "Y".
> >
> > +config DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH
> > + bool "Display graphic splash"
> > + depends on DRM_CLIENT_SELECTION
> > + select DRM_CLIENT
> > + select DRM_CLIENT_SETUP
> > + select DRM_DRAW
> > + help
> > + This enables a splash drm client, able to display either a plain
> > + color or a static image until the userspace is ready to take over.
> > + The splash will be displayed on all screens available at boot, if
> > + any, or on the ones part of the first hotplug event.
> > +
> > +config DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BACKGROUND_COLOR
> > + hex "Splash background color"
> > + depends on DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH
> > + default 0x000000
> > + help
> > + The default splash background color, in RGB888 format.
> > +
> > + The color can be overridden through the drm_client_lib.splash_color
> > + kernel command line parameter.
> > +
> > +config DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BMP_SUPPORT
> > + bool
> > +
> > +choice
> > + prompt "Splash source"
> > + depends on DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH
> > + default DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_SRC_COLOR
> > + help
> > + Selects the source for the splash graphic.
> > +
> > +config DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_SRC_COLOR
> > + bool "Solid color"
> > + help
> > + Use a solid color as splash. The color is selected through the
> > + DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BACKGROUND_COLOR config option.
> > +
> > + The image will be loaded using the firmware loading facility the
> > + kernel provides.
> > +
> > +config DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_SRC_BMP
> > + bool "BMP image"
> > + select DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BMP_SUPPORT
> > + select FW_LOADER
> > + help
> > + Use a BMP (bitmap) image as splash. If the image is smaller than the
> > + display(s), it will be centered and the color specified through the
> > + DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BACKGROUND_COLOR config option will be used as
> > + background.
> > +
> > + The image will be loaded using the firmware loading facility the
> > + kernel provides; it shall use 24 bits per pixel and shall not be
> > + compressed. The name of the file can be set through the
> > + drm_client_lib.splash_bmp command line parameter, with the default
> > + being 'drm_splash.bmp'.
> > +
> > +config DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_SRC_BGRT
> > + bool "EFI BGRT"
> > + select DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BMP_SUPPORT
> > + depends on EFI
> > + help
> > + Use the BGRT image provided by the EFI bootloader. If the image is
> > + smaller than the display(s), it will be centered and the color
> > + specified through the DRM_CLIENT_SPLASH_BACKGROUND_COLOR config
> > + option will be used as background.
> > +
> > +endchoice
>
> I'm not sure we should consider it a xor choice. If we do, that means
> that it's effectively unusable by distros, since you don't know ahead of
> time if the platform it's going to boot on will have a BGRT or not.
>
> Trying BGRT, and then falling back to either an image or a solid
> background would be easier to work with.
>
Thanks for the feedback!
Also considering that BGRT requires some logic to work properly, which
is not present in this version (and here I am referring mostly to the
rotation/positioning quirks), I think I'll go down this very route for
the next version and get rid of the function pointer logic.
The idea was to avoid ifdefs _and_ be open for future expansions, but
in the end it would probably look ugly.
> Maxime
Regards,
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists