[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXMtnCnTXq96efmH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 10:13:16 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>,
Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.gradinariu@...log.com>,
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: accel: adxl380: Optimize reading of FIFO
entries in interrupt handler
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 07:53:13PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:23:17 +0100
> Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> > In order to minimize the time required for transferring FIFO data from the
> > sensor to the host machine, perform the read from the FIFO in a single call
> > to regmap_bulk_read().
> It's a call to regmap_noinc_read() not regmap_bulk_read()
> I'll fix it.
This is interesting, does it mean the patch was never tested on the real HW?
Or maybe noninc is intentional?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists