| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202601231700.admSdObE-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 17:25:22 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, pavel@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
neelx@...e.com, atomlin@...mlin.com, sean@...e.io,
mproche@...il.com, chjohnst@...il.com, nick.lange@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM: QoS: Introduce boot parameter
pm_qos_resume_latency_us
Hi Aaron,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on driver-core/driver-core-testing]
[also build test ERROR on driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus rafael-pm/linux-next rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master amd-pstate/linux-next amd-pstate/bleeding-edge v6.19-rc6 next-20260122]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aaron-Tomlin/PM-QoS-Introduce-boot-parameter-pm_qos_resume_latency_us/20260123-090409
base: driver-core/driver-core-testing
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260123010024.3301276-1-atomlin%40atomlin.com
patch subject: [PATCH] PM: QoS: Introduce boot parameter pm_qos_resume_latency_us
config: arm64-randconfig-r072-20260123 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260123/202601231700.admSdObE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
smatch version: v0.5.0-8994-gd50c5a4c
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260123/202601231700.admSdObE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601231700.admSdObE-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/power/qos.c: In function 'init_pm_qos_latency_us_setup':
>> kernel/power/qos.c:268:6: error: 'boot_option_idle_override' undeclared (first use in this function)
if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_POLL) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/power/qos.c:268:6: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> kernel/power/qos.c:268:35: error: 'IDLE_POLL' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SIL_POLL'?
if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_POLL) {
^~~~~~~~~
SIL_POLL
vim +/boot_option_idle_override +268 kernel/power/qos.c
245
246 /* init_pm_qos_latency_us_setup - Parse the pm_qos_latency_us boot parameter.
247 *
248 * Parses the kernel command line option "pm_qos_resume_latency_us=" to establish
249 * per-CPU resume latency constraints. These constraints are applied
250 * immediately when a CPU is registered.
251 *
252 * Syntax: pm_qos_resume_latency_us=<cpu-list>:<value>[,<cpu-list>:<value>...]
253 * Example: pm_qos_resume_latency_us=0-3:0,4-7:20
254 *
255 * The parsing logic enforces a "First Match Wins" policy. If a CPU is
256 * covered by multiple entries in the list, only the first valid entry
257 * applies. Any subsequent overlapping ranges for that CPU are ignored.
258 *
259 * Return: 0 on success, or a negative error code on failure.
260 */
261 static int __init init_pm_qos_latency_us_setup(void)
262 {
263 char *token, *cmd = pm_qos_resume_latency_cmdline;
264 struct pm_qos_boot_entry *entry, *tentry;
265 cpumask_var_t covered;
266 int ret;
267
> 268 if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_POLL) {
269 pr_warn("pm_qos: Cannot be used with idle=poll\n");
270 return -EINVAL;
271 }
272
273 if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&covered, GFP_KERNEL)) {
274 pr_warn("pm_qos: Failed to allocate memory for parsing boot parameter\n");
275 return -ENOMEM;
276 }
277
278 while ((token = strsep(&cmd, ",")) != NULL) {
279 char *str_range, *str_val;
280
281 str_range = strsep(&token, ":");
282 str_val = token;
283
284 if (!str_val) {
285 pr_warn("pm_qos: Missing value range %s\n",
286 str_range);
287 continue;
288 }
289
290 entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
291 if (!entry) {
292 pr_warn("pm_qos: Failed to allocate memory for boot entry\n");
293 goto cleanup;
294 }
295
296 if (cpulist_parse(str_range, &entry->mask)) {
297 pr_warn("pm_qos: Failed to parse cpulist range %s\n",
298 str_range);
299 kfree(entry);
300 continue;
301 }
302
303 cpumask_andnot(&entry->mask, &entry->mask, covered);
304 if (cpumask_empty(&entry->mask)) {
305 pr_warn("pm_qos: Entry %s already covered, ignoring\n",
306 str_range);
307 kfree(entry);
308 continue;
309 }
310 cpumask_or(covered, covered, &entry->mask);
311
312 if (kstrtos32(str_val, 0, &entry->latency)) {
313 pr_warn("pm_qos: Invalid latency requirement value %s\n",
314 str_val);
315 kfree(entry);
316 continue;
317 }
318
319 if (entry->latency < 0) {
320 pr_warn("pm_qos: Latency requirement cannot be negative: %d\n",
321 entry->latency);
322 kfree(entry);
323 continue;
324 }
325
326 list_add_tail(&entry->node, &pm_qos_boot_list);
327 }
328
329 free_cpumask_var(covered);
330 return 0;
331
332 cleanup:
333 list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tentry, &pm_qos_boot_list, node) {
334 list_del(&entry->node);
335 kfree(entry);
336 }
337
338 free_cpumask_var(covered);
339 return ret;
340 }
341 early_initcall(init_pm_qos_latency_us_setup);
342
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists