[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d2161f4252546f252dd0a84c461ba5dbb3b63e22d4826771edd8f1f30df050bc@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:29:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org
To: hui.zhu@...ux.dev,akpm@...ux-foundation.org,hannes@...xchg.org,mhocko@...nel.org,roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,muchun.song@...ux.dev,ast@...nel.org,daniel@...earbox.net,andrii@...nel.org,martin.lau@...ux.dev,eddyz87@...il.com,song@...nel.org,yonghong.song@...ux.dev,john.fastabend@...il.com,kpsingh@...nel.org,sdf@...ichev.me,haoluo@...gle.com,jolsa@...nel.org,shuah@...nel.org,peterz@...radead.org,ojeda@...nel.org,nathan@...nel.org,kees@...nel.org,tj@...nel.org,jeffxu@...omium.org,mkoutny@...e.com,kernel@...rr.cc,brauner@...nel.org,rdunlap@...radead.org,brgerst@...il.com,masahiroy@...nel.org,davem@...emloft.net,kuba@...nel.org,hawk@...nel.org,inwardvessel@...il.com,willemb@...gle.com,kerneljasonxing@...il.com,paul.chaignon@...il.com,a.s.protopopov@...il.com,ameryhung@...il.com,chenridong@...weicloud.com,lance.yang@...ux.dev,jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev,linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,linux-mm@...ck.org,cgroups@...r.kernel.org,bpf@...r.kernel.org,netdev@...r.kernel.org,linu
x-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: zhuhui@...inos.cn,geliang@...nel.org,ast@...nel.org,andrii@...nel.org,daniel@...earbox.net,martin.lau@...nel.org,eddyz87@...il.com,yonghong.song@...ux.dev,clm@...a.com,ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 10/12] mm/bpf: Add BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE support for memcg_bpf_ops
> diff --git a/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c b/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c
> index 415e3c59b6a6..0ded1fdd0de8 100644
> --- a/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c
[ ... ]
> static int bpf_memcg_ops_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
> {
> struct bpf_struct_ops_link *ops_link
> = container_of(link, struct bpf_struct_ops_link, link);
> struct memcg_bpf_ops *ops = kdata;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg, *iter = NULL;
> int err = 0;
>
> + if (ops_link->flags & ~BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE) {
> + pr_err("attach only support BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> memcg = mem_cgroup_get_from_ino(ops_link->cgroup_id);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(memcg))
> return PTR_ERR(memcg);
>
> cgroup_lock();
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(memcg->bpf_ops)) {
> + /* Check if bpf_ops of the parent is BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE. */
> + if (memcg->bpf_ops_flags & BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE) {
> + iter = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
> +
> + if (!iter)
> + goto busy_out;
> + if (READ_ONCE(iter->bpf_ops) !=
> + READ_ONCE(memcg->bpf_ops))
> + goto busy_out;
> + } else {
> +busy_out:
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + goto unlock_out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> while ((iter = mem_cgroup_iter(memcg, iter, NULL))) {
^^^^
When the override check passes (all conditions at lines 363-377 are met),
iter is set to parent_mem_cgroup(memcg) but is never reset to NULL before
this loop. Should iter be reset to NULL here?
The mem_cgroup_iter() function expects prev (iter) to be either NULL or a
previous result from iterating within memcg's descendants. When iter points
to memcg's parent, the iteration will not correctly traverse memcg's
subtree since parent is outside that subtree.
For comparison, bpf_memcg_ops_unreg() correctly resets iter to NULL before
its loop:
> + iter = NULL;
> + while ((iter = mem_cgroup_iter(memcg, iter, NULL))) {
> if (READ_ONCE(iter->bpf_ops)) {
> - mem_cgroup_iter_break(memcg, iter);
> - err = -EBUSY;
> - break;
> + /* cannot override existing bpf_ops of sub-cgroup. */
> + continue;
> }
> WRITE_ONCE(iter->bpf_ops, ops);
> + iter->bpf_ops_flags = ops_link->flags;
> }
[ ... ]
---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/21280790825
Powered by blists - more mailing lists