[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176913271924.4027.2857487573564767197@lazor>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 18:45:19 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>, NĂcolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 2/5] clk: mediatek: Refactor pll registration to pass device
Quoting Nicolas Frattaroli (2025-12-15 03:23:59)
> As it stands, mtk_clk_register_plls takes a struct device_node pointer
> as its first argument. This is a tragic happenstance, as it's trivial to
> get the device_node from a struct device, but the opposite not so much.
> The struct device is a much more useful thing to have passed down.
>
> Refactor mtk_clk_register_plls to take a struct device pointer instead
> of a struct device_node pointer, and fix up all users of this function.
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists