[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260124093505.GA98529@j66a10360.sqa.eu95>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 17:35:05 +0800
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com >
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@...ux.ibm.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oliver.yang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] mm: vmalloc: export find_vm_area()
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:55:17PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 04:23:48PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> > find_vm_area() provides a way to find the vm_struct associated with a
> > virtual address. Export this symbol to modules so that modularized
> > subsystems can perform lookups on vmalloc addresses.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmalloc.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > index ecbac900c35f..3eb9fe761c34 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > @@ -3292,6 +3292,7 @@ struct vm_struct *find_vm_area(const void *addr)
> >
> > return va->vm;
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_vm_area);
> >
> This is internal. We can not just export it.
>
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki
Hi Uladzislau,
Thank you for the feedback. I agree that we should avoid exposing
internal implementation details like struct vm_struct to external
subsystems.
Following Christoph's suggestion, I'm planning to encapsulate the page
order lookup into a minimal helper instead:
unsigned int vmalloc_page_order(const void *addr){
struct vm_struct *vm;
vm = find_vm_area(addr);
return vm ? vm->page_order : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vmalloc_page_order);
Does this approach look reasonable to you? It would keep the vm_struct
layout private while satisfying the optimization needs of SMC.
Thanks,
D. Wythe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists