[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d930ac7-11b1-437b-be18-7a785f20a72f@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 10:09:19 +0100
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>, Edwin Peer <epeer@...dia.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] gpu: nova-core: use checked arithmetic in FWSEC
firmware parsing
Hi Joel,
On 25.01.26 00:18, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Use checked_add() and checked_mul() when computing offsets from
> firmware-provided values in new_fwsec().
>
> Without checked arithmetic, corrupt firmware could cause integer overflow. The
> danger is not just wrapping to a huge value, but potentially wrapping to a
> small plausible offset that passes validation yet accesses entirely wrong data,
> causing silent corruption or security issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/fwsec.rs | 60 ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/fwsec.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/fwsec.rs
> index a8ec08a500ac..1a91bbbce3d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/fwsec.rs
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware/fwsec.rs
> @@ -46,10 +46,7 @@
...
> @@ -356,8 +362,12 @@ pub(crate) fn new(
> // Patch signature if needed.
> let desc = bios.fwsec_image().header()?;
> let ucode_signed = if desc.signature_count() != 0 {
> - let sig_base_img =
> - usize::from_safe_cast(desc.imem_load_size() + desc.pkc_data_offset());
> + // Compute sig_base_img = desc.imem_load_size + desc.pkc_data_offset.
Nit: Drop `desc.` to make it consistent with the other comments.
Best regards
Dirk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists