[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72my2WQm9z_iF46e3Umqt1HZ5gthneXMLP-0VCF8EMSz1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2026 16:33:28 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Luis Augenstein <luis.augenstein@...tech.com>, nathan@...nel.org, nsc@...nel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, maximilian.huber@...tech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Add SPDX SBOM generation tool
On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 4:20 PM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> After all, the kernel image should not change at all whether there is
> an SBOM or not.
Well, I guess the SBOM could be saved into the kernel itself (and
perhaps retrieved in different ways, e.g. at runtime), in which case,
then an option definitely makes sense.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists