[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260126-swap-table-p3-v1-10-a74155fab9b0@tencent.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 01:57:33 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] mm, swap: no need to truncate the scan border
From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
swap_map had a static flexible size, so the last cluster won't be fully
covered, hence the allocator needs to check the scan border to avoid
OOB. But the swap table has a fixed-sized swap table for each cluster,
and the slots beyond the device size are marked as bad slots. The
allocator can simply scan all slots as usual, and any bad slots will be
skipped.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 2febe868986e..1cf18761c0fd 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -945,8 +945,8 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
{
unsigned int next = SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID, found = SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID;
unsigned long start = ALIGN_DOWN(offset, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
- unsigned long end = min(start + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, si->max);
unsigned int order = likely(folio) ? folio_order(folio) : 0;
+ unsigned long end = start + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
unsigned int nr_pages = 1 << order;
bool need_reclaim, ret, usable;
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists