linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72n7EspYnQ-8WLhVAdqsPk1B6=gVmMiWdoCwMxkHC-boKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:31:42 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>, 
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 7:36 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> The UML Rust support is pretty stable for the core Rust bits, KUnit
> tests, etc. It can get a little broken from time to time with new
> drivers, gcc-based builds (instead of LLVM=1), or 32-bit builds.
> Ideally, those will work as well --- everything seems fine at the
> moment --- and you shouldn't have any problems with just running:
>
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kconfig_add CONFIG_RUST=y
> --make_options LLVM=1
>
> But do let me know if anything is broken.

Thanks David!

Cheers,
Miguel