[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0fe71377-df0a-4e8e-a787-73455eddc133@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:53:02 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Chaotian Jing <Chaotian.Jing@...iatek.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@...labora.com>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 23/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Remove undocumented
"clk-scale-up-vcore-min"
Il 24/01/26 13:01, Nicolas Frattaroli ha scritto:
> The MediaTek UFS driver contains support for an undocumented,
> non-vendor-prefixed u32 property named "clk-scale-up-vcore-min".
>
> Since it is not part of any binding, and would not pass a bindings
> review in its current form, remove it.
>
> To return this functionality, it needs to be resubmitted in a series
> that also introduces it to the binding, and justifies what it is used
> for. Compatibility with downstream device trees is not a valid
> justification for its existence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Not sure what this is used for, because then UFS DVFS for gears should be managed
with OPPs (either dynamic or static) anyway, so the vcore (I guess this is the scp
vcore in dvfsrc regulators) should be scaled like so, without ugly init hacks like
the one that you just removed.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists