linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/21] iio: Replace IRQF_ONESHOT with IRQF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260126-delectable-utopian-oriole-5418c6@lemur>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:09:25 -0500
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, tools@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, 
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>, 
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, 
	Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, 
	Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>, 
	Kent Gustavsson <kent@...oris.se>, Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@...il.com>, 
	Nishant Malpani <nish.malpani25@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] iio: Replace IRQF_ONESHOT with IRQF_NO_THREAD

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 04:57:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> What I have i mind is rather the scenario when I see already sent (by somebody
> else) patch in the mailing list and I want develop a followup with the same
> To/Cc list. So I want `b4 ... --use/restore-to-cc-from-the-mailing-list / lore`
> type of functionality.

To understand it better -- you want to send a new revision to a patch sent by
someone else? If so, you should be able to "b4 prep --from-thread <msgid>",
but it's actually a good question if that will do the right thing with content
under "---" or not, as I'm not sure this part was ever properly tested.

-K