[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF49yM4UN36-kQsux7LM3YrV4PwEoWMZ_Rv1-_RTNZCH+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:43:20 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 11:21 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> [..]
> > void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)
> > {
> > - flushwq = alloc_workqueue("slub_flushwq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_SLUB_TINY
>
> This ifndef does not belong here.
>
> > + flushwq = alloc_workqueue("slub_flushwq", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_PERCPU,
> > + 0);
> > WARN_ON(!flushwq);
> > }
>
> Without the ifndef above I am happy with
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Thanks, it seems like I messed up the thing when I rebased...
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists