linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the fs-next tree with the mm-unstable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aXeZNSiVv82Gc9HF@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:41:25 +0000
From: Mark <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the fs-next tree with the mm-unstable
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got a conflict in:

  fs/ntfs3/file.c

between commit:

  77a150da4e780 ("mm: update all remaining mmap_prepare users to use vma_flags_t")

from the mm-unstable tree and commit:

  9d5403b1036cd ("fs: convert most other generic_file_*mmap() users to .mmap_prepare()")
  099ef9ab9203d (fs/ntfs3: implement iomap-based file operations)

from the fs-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc fs/ntfs3/file.c
index 2902fc6d9a85d,571ee85e82594..0000000000000
--- a/fs/ntfs3/file.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/file.c
@@@ -346,8 -246,7 +246,7 @@@ static int ntfs_file_mmap_prepare(struc
  	struct file *file = desc->file;
  	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
  	struct ntfs_inode *ni = ntfs_i(inode);
- 	u64 from = ((u64)desc->pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT);
 -	bool rw = desc->vm_flags & VM_WRITE;
 +	const bool rw = vma_desc_test_flags(desc, VMA_WRITE_BIT);
  	int err;
  
  	/* Avoid any operation if inode is bad. */