[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fV30XHi78SBHc=mJUK-7t9uiJb_YPHWZSG2g0Rm745pbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 09:20:33 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Quan Zhou <zhouquan@...as.ac.cn>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@...el.com>, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Derek Foreman <derek.foreman@...labora.com>, Aditya Bodkhe <aditya.b1@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>,
Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tanze <tanze@...inos.cn>,
Hrishikesh Suresh <hrishikesh123s@...il.com>, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
Krzysztof Łopatowski <krzysztof.m.lopatowski@...il.com>,
Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com>, Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>, Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] perf sample: Add evsel to sample and avoid passing
as a pair
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM Mi, Dapeng <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/26/2026 3:18 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > The perf_sample and evsel are typically passed as a pair. This creates
> > 2 arguments for the price of 1. It is also inconvenient if you wish to
> > rewrite a sample, as the evsel will need updating in all cases,
> > something similar to this currently happens for off-cpu output. Avoid
> > passing the evsel by adding it into the sample. So that two evsels
> > aren't being passed around, fix up functions taking a sample and an
> > evsel argument to only take a sample, the evsel now being able to be
> > read from the sample.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > This is a fairly large and invasive change but doing something some
> > what mundane. Sending out as an RFC for early feedback.
>
> Nice cleanup. Better split this huge patch into several patches in the
> formal patch-set. Thanks.
Having several patches means having intermediate states where there
are 2 evsels (a parameter and one in the sample). Getting things
building with lots of intermediate states is one thing, having things
work and not break tests is another. I'll see what can be done, but it
was somewhat deliberate not to have intermediate broken states with
the albeit large patch.
Thanks,
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists