[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXfGcIpeXQNRUI-A@elver.google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 20:54:24 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Optimize __READ_ONCE() with CONFIG_LTO=y
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 08:56AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026, at 01:25, Marco Elver wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> > index fc0fb42b0b64..9963948f4b44 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
> > @@ -32,8 +32,7 @@
> > #define __READ_ONCE(x) \
> > ({ \
> > typeof(&(x)) __x = &(x); \
> > - int atomic = 1; \
> > - union { __unqual_scalar_typeof(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
> > + union { TYPEOF_UNQUAL(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
> > switch (sizeof(x)) { \
> > case 1: \
> > asm volatile(__LOAD_RCPC(b, %w0, %1) \
>
> How does this work with CC_HAS_TYPEOF_UNQUAL=false?
>
> As far as I can tell, TYPEOF_UNQUAL() falls back to __typeof__
> on gcc-13, clang-18 and earlier, and not strip out qualifiers.
I think we only need to worry about Clang for LTO builds. But yeah, our
minimum supported Clang is 15, so between 15-18 it'd be broken.
> With fd69b2f7d5f4 ("compiler: Use __typeof_unqual__() for
> __unqual_scalar_typeof()"), I would expect __unqual_scalar_typeof()
> to do the right thing already.
It'd still be broken for Clang 15-18, so it won't help much. We need
this to work for more than "scalar", so even though it'll work for Clang
19+ given the redefinition to __typeof_unqual__, we should deprecate the
_Generic-based __unqual_scalar_typeof() sooner than later.
I was able to make this work for older compilers:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
index 85b1dd7b0274..d6c808cc01be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h
@@ -19,6 +19,18 @@
"ldapr" #sfx "\t" #regs, \
ARM64_HAS_LDAPR)
+#ifdef USE_TYPEOF_UNQUAL
+#define __read_once_typeof(x) TYPEOF_UNQUAL(x)
+#else
+/*
+ * Fallback for older compilers to infer an unqualified type, using the fact
+ * that __auto_type is supposed to drop qualifiers. Unlike typeof_unqual(), the
+ * type must be complete (defines an unevaluated local variable). This must
+ * already be guaranteed because sizeof(x) is used in the __READ_ONCE macro.
+ */
+#define __read_once_typeof(x) typeof(({ __auto_type ____t = (x); ____t; }))
+#endif
+
/*
* When building with LTO, there is an increased risk of the compiler
* converting an address dependency headed by a READ_ONCE() invocation
@@ -32,8 +44,8 @@
#define __READ_ONCE(x) \
({ \
auto __x = &(x); \
- auto __ret = (TYPEOF_UNQUAL(*__x) *)__x, *__retp = &__ret; \
- union { TYPEOF_UNQUAL(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
+ auto __ret = (__read_once_typeof(*__x) *)__x, *__retp = &__ret; \
+ union { __read_once_typeof(*__x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; \
*__retp = &__u.__val; \
switch (sizeof(x)) { \
case 1: \
Thoughts?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists