[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260126204443.GX1134360@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:44:43 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, jpb@...nel.org,
praan@...gle.com, miko.lenczewski@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Store IOTLB cache tags in
struct arm_smmu_attach_state
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:24:19PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> +int arm_smmu_domain_get_iotlb_tag(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> + struct arm_smmu_inv *tag)
> +{
> + /* Decide the type of the iotlb cache tag */
> + switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
> + case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_SVA:
> + case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
> + tag->type = INV_TYPE_S1_ASID;
> + break;
> + case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
> + tag->type = INV_TYPE_S2_VMID;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tag->smmu = smmu;
> +
> + if (tag->type == INV_TYPE_S1_ASID)
> + tag->id = smmu_domain->cd.asid;
> + else
> + tag->id = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid;
Would be tidier to move these up into the case
Otherwise looks OK
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists