[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MctBqEcoDOG6BGtd=ri-c9X9awnfrojtYRVPQfp8EfGdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 10:06:41 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
will@...nel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
khilman@...nel.org, linusw@...nel.org, driver-core@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: do not register driver in probe()
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 2:44 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri Jan 23, 2026 at 2:31 PM CET, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > However, for the purpose of avoiding the described potential deadlock in
> > combination with commit dc23806a7c47 ("driver core: enforce device_lock for
> > driver_match_device()"), this patch only addresses the driver registration
> > issue.
>
> I.e. unless there are any concerns, I'd like to take this one through the
> driver-core tree.
It looks good to me, but it's a GPIO driver, this can go together with
GPIO fixes for v6.19-rc8 as usual.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists