[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kkxS9ACvR52q03AN+WdFV96cK+tvejnnDXKZTKuKZH9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 03:09:19 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...nel.org>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer.py: define scripts
On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 5:53 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Generate rust-project.json entries for scripts written in Rust.
>
> Use `Pathlib.path.stem` for consistency.
>
> Fixes: 9a8ff24ce584 ("scripts: add `generate_rust_target.rs`")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
> Tested-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...nel.org>
Hmm... This introduces support for scripts, right? i.e. it is a
feature, or am I misunderstanding the Fixes:/Cc: stable tags?
Also, I don't see the Tested-by from Daniel -- he gave it on the last
patch in v4, but not this one. Was it because it was assumed that
testing the last patch meant testing all? Generally that shouldn't be
assumed, e.g. he gave two Tested-by tags, so I guess he didn't mean to
give it to all.
I would also suggest on apply to give it a bit more details.
Anyway, this seems best suited for rust-analyzer-next after the merge
window when the above is sorted out.
Thanks for reviving these patches and splitting them!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists