linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Remove not useful void return function statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <118afb07-2dd4-457d-a3fc-d89c93473dbe@web.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:22:36 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Khairul Anuar Romli <karom.9560@...il.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
 Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: dw-axi-dmac: Remove not useful void
 return function statements

> Remove an unnecessary `return` statement from a

Would such information be also appropriate for a summary phrase?


…
> semantic. This unnecessary return were detected with the help of the
> checkpatch.pl analysis tool with --strict --file option.

How do you think about to mention a “warning” better in the change description?

Would it be nicer to put such a hint into another paragraph?

Regards,
Markus