lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bddc0469f25843ca5ae0cf578ab3671435ae98a7.1769429546.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:12:26 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: brgl@...nel.org,
	linusw@...nel.org,
	heiko@...ech.de
Cc: sebastian.reichel@...labora.com,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio/rockchip: Stop calling pinctrl for set_direction

Marking the whole controller as sleeping due to the pinctrl calls in the
.direction_{input,output} callbacks has the unfortunate side effect that
legitimate invocations of .get and .set, which cannot themselves sleep,
in atomic context now spew WARN()s from gpiolib.

However, as Heiko points out, the driver doing this is a bit silly to
begin with, as the pinctrl .gpio_set_direction hook doesn't even care
about the direction, the hook is only used to claim the mux. And sure
enough, the .gpio_request_enable hook exists to serve this very purpose,
so switch to that and remove the problematic business entirely.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 20cf2aed89ac ("gpio: rockchip: mark the GPIO controller as sleeping")
Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
---
If I don't have to redesign bits of the GPIO subsystem itself, this much
I can do :)

Tested on RK3399 NanoPC-T4 with GPIOs with and without explicit pinctrl,
and PROVE_LOCKING and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP stayed quiet (although I don't
think this board has any shared pins)
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c       | 8 --------
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 9 ++++-----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c
index bae2061f15fc..0fff4a699f12 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
-#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -164,12 +163,6 @@ static int rockchip_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 data = input ? 0 : 1;
 
-
-	if (input)
-		pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(chip, offset);
-	else
-		pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(chip, offset);
-
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
 	rockchip_gpio_writel_bit(bank, offset, data, bank->gpio_regs->port_ddr);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
@@ -593,7 +586,6 @@ static int rockchip_gpiolib_register(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank)
 	gc->ngpio = bank->nr_pins;
 	gc->label = bank->name;
 	gc->parent = bank->dev;
-	gc->can_sleep = true;
 
 	ret = gpiochip_add_data(gc, bank);
 	if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
index e44ef262beec..2fc67aeafdb3 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
@@ -3545,10 +3545,9 @@ static int rockchip_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int rockchip_pmx_gpio_set_direction(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
-					   struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
-					   unsigned offset,
-					   bool input)
+static int rockchip_pmx_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+					    struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range,
+					    unsigned int offset)
 {
 	struct rockchip_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
 	struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank;
@@ -3562,7 +3561,7 @@ static const struct pinmux_ops rockchip_pmx_ops = {
 	.get_function_name	= rockchip_pmx_get_func_name,
 	.get_function_groups	= rockchip_pmx_get_groups,
 	.set_mux		= rockchip_pmx_set,
-	.gpio_set_direction	= rockchip_pmx_gpio_set_direction,
+	.gpio_request_enable	= rockchip_pmx_gpio_request_enable,
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ