[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nEZ6qaeN0y0nj_uDgTj1cjVCZVvycA4BA0W0wYCd_dWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 04:13:32 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: engineer.jjhama@...il.com
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesung Yang <y.j3ms.n@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer: fix resolution of
#[pin_data] macros
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 2:19 PM SeungJong Ha via B4 Relay
<devnull+engineer.jjhama.gmail.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: SeungJong Ha <engineer.jjhama@...il.com>
>
> Currently, rust-analyzer fails to properly resolve structs annotated with
> `#[pin_data]`. This prevents IDE features like "Go to Definition" from
> working correctly for those structs.
>
> Add the missing configuration to `generate_rust_analyzer.py` to ensure
> the `pin-init` crate macros are handled correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeungJong Ha <engineer.jjhama@...il.com>
Applied to `rust-fixes` -- thanks everyone!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists